Is Expert Witness Testimony Required in Medical Malpractice?
Most cases that involve a claim for malpractice in a medical situation require the services of an independent medical expert to testify to the court regarding the injury. In some cases, an expert is not required, but usually, the negligence is so evident it is clear to the court there has been professional performance below an expected standard of care that an expert opinion is not needed. In either situation it is always best to contact a malpractice lawyer like the attorneys at Cochran, Kroll, & Associates P.C. to decide the best course of action.
The plaintiff in the malpractice suit must be able to prove there was a degree of negligence on the part of the medical practitioner that caused the injury, and the injury itself is not enough to prove the negligence. This is why an expert is called in. An expert is a person who can present a credible explanation of what went wrong, and this person must have the qualifications to convince the court that a prudent doctor would not have made the decision that led to the injury.
Qualifications of an Expert Witness
In Michigan, an expert witness has to be able to meet specific standards to be credible in the eyes of the court. The judge will take into consideration the education of the witness and the general training of the witness in the medical profession. In some cases, a judge will not allow one doctor to testify against another unless there is a clear distinction between their status in terms of education. Malpractice lawyers must be aware of this when choosing witnesses.
The court will also look to see if the witness is specialized in the treatment associated with the injury, and the length of time the expert has been engaged in clinical work. If the expert is also an instructor for other physicians, there might be a question about qualifications if the expert spends more time in the classroom than in the actual treatment of patients.
Benefits of Having an Expert Testify
As a qualified medical professional, the expert who testifies can add a great deal to the plaintiff’s case. The expert can offer a clear explanation of the medical procedures inherent to the case, and he can point out inconsistencies in the decisions leading to the injury. In complex cases, the defendant will also have an expert witness to support the procedures taken, and this will provide a balance to all testimony given in the trial. It is important to always keep in mind the weight and significance of the issues in the case, and the expert witness adds a great deal of credibility to the plaintiff’s argument.
How Negligence is Established
Proving the standard of care is the underlying theme in medical malpractice lawsuits. The standard of care is the expectation that the patient’s doctor did the same thing and acted the same way that any other medical professional would have done. Once the plaintiff proves that a lower level of care was provided, then the plaintiff can ask for compensation for injuries. The expert witness can testify to the level of care that would have been acceptable in the same situation, and he can suggest other steps and procedures that might have been taken when if the care was within accepted standards.
The testimony of an expert witness is not always required for a malpractice medical lawsuit. However, in most cases, the issues are very complex, and the expert will assist the plaintiff in communicating the seriousness of the injuries being claimed. At our law firm in Michigan, we take extra care to provide the highest qualified witnesses to support your unique case. Contact us at 1-866-MICH-LAW (1-866-642-4529) for a free consultation.